While we have all heard of one-off extreme (and violent) reactions of a frustrated employee in office, most times things don’t reach that level and people leave. However, I have seen organizations trying to retain employees in the guise of performance even when they know that the mere presence of the frustrated employee is not good for the rest of the team. These are just some of the effects that a frustrated employee might have on others:
- Negativity – A frustrated employee is a constant cribber. He would rather see the glass half empty than half full. This becomes a habit and co-workers are fed on constant negativity and how things are bad in the organization. It takes a very mature co-worker to filter this barrage of negativity flowing round the clock.
- Going slow on work – A frustrated employee does not see value in the work he/she is doing. Hence, his/her productivity goes down and the delivery expected almost never happens on time.
- Glorifying what’s happening outside – A frustrated employee starts comparing and pointing out the perks / benefits available in other organizations vs. yours. This in turn inspires and makes other employees think that the grass is greener outside.
- Inspiring others to leave – A frustrated employee might even start helping others in their job search thereby aiming at inflicting maximum harm to the organization.
A frustrated employee aims at vitiating the atmosphere in the office. Considering the fact that we end up spending most of our awake time in office with the same set of people, is it not logical on the part of organizations to let go off such employees rather than persisting with them?